Below is the response I got from Feedback at Family Search when I submitted the problem of finding the marriage of Jn. De Villalpando and Franca de la Roca, at San Felipe, Guanajuato, on 11 June 1618, but couldn’t find that range of dates listed in the images. So it seems that some images can’t be accessed from the listings for the images for the particular parish, but they are under a general category called Mexico Marriages.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Dear Emilie Garcia,
Thank you for contacting FamilySearch to report the marriage of Jn de Villalpando and Franca. de la Rocha, for 11 Jun 1618 appearing in images beginning in 1665.
We were unable to replicate your issue and found the marriage for Jn de Villalpando and Franca. de la Rocha listed under our collection: Mexico Marriages, 1570-1950.
If we have misunderstood the issue you are having, please respond to this email by choosing the reply to sender feature so your response will be directed back to us.
We believe this information answers your question. However, please feel free to contact us with other issues you might encounter in using Historical Records; we will be happy to assist you.
Below is the response I got from Feedback at Family Search when I submitted
the problem of finding the marriage of Jn. De Villalpando and Franca de la
Roca, at San Felipe, Guanajuato, on 11 June 1618, but couldn’t find that
range of dates listed in the images. So it seems that some images can’t be
accessed from the listings for the images for the particular parish, but
they are under a general category called Mexico Marriages.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Dear Emilie Garcia,
Thank you for contacting FamilySearch to report the marriage of Jn de
Villalpando and Franca. de la Rocha, for 11 Jun 1618 appearing in images
beginning in 1665.
We were unable to replicate your issue and found the marriage for Jn de
Villalpando and Franca. de la Rocha listed under our collection: Mexico
Marriages, 1570-1950.
If we have misunderstood the issue you are having, please respond to this
email by choosing the reply to sender feature so your response will be
directed back to us.
We believe this information answers your question. However, please feel
free to contact us with other issues you might encounter in using Historical
Records; we will be happy to assist you.
Below is the response I got from Feedback at Family Search when I submitted
the problem of finding the marriage of Jn. De Villalpando and Franca de la
Roca, at San Felipe, Guanajuato, on 11 June 1618, but couldn’t find that
range of dates listed in the images. So it seems that some images can’t be
accessed from the listings for the images for the particular parish, but
they are under a general category called Mexico Marriages.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Dear Emilie Garcia,
Thank you for contacting FamilySearch to report the marriage of Jn de
Villalpando and Franca. de la Rocha, for 11 Jun 1618 appearing in images
beginning in 1665.
We were unable to replicate your issue and found the marriage for Jn de
Villalpando and Franca. de la Rocha listed under our collection: Mexico
Marriages, 1570-1950.
If we have misunderstood the issue you are having, please respond to this
email by choosing the reply to sender feature so your response will be
directed back to us.
We believe this information answers your question. However, please feel
free to contact us with other issues you might encounter in using Historical
Records; we will be happy to assist you.
I just got this response below from Family Search Feedback. As usual, I don’t know what they are talking about.
I no longer have trouble moving from image to image.
I did complain about the little box on the bottom right (I guess that is what they mean by the image map) no longer being available. Because of my arthritis, I find it very difficult to move my mouse around the whole screen instead of just around the little window.
I don’t know what they mean about edge to edge viewing of images, or HTML being browser resident—terms too technical for me.
I am glad that on October 1 I will be able to print only the part of the image I want instead of having to save both pages on the image, then cropping it using other software. Too much rigamaroll.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Dear Emilie Garcia,
Thank you for sharing your concerns about changes to FamilySearch.
Following are some reasons for the change:
There are problems using the current Flash version, such as moving from image to image in full screen view and others.
Flash is difficult to maintain with different versions of Windows, browsers, etc.
Many archives do not allow Flash technology.
Flash cannot show images with large pixel sizes.
Flash doesn’t run on mobile devices.
Flash doesn’t run well with the MACs.
These features are no longer available in the HTML version:
The image map in the lower right hand corner - patrons can use the mouse to move the image around the screen
Full screen - edge to edge viewing of images - the HTML version is browser resident
Printing will be full screen - partial printing will be not be available until the first week of October, 2011; thereafter patron will be able to adjust screen to correct size and print what they see.
We are here to help you in any way that we can and want your experience to be a positive one. Best wishes and success in your continuing family history endeavors.
Emilie,
I’m glad to hear that the “selected portion” to print feature will be restored in October. I do miss being able to zoom-in or enlarge an entry and print it to almost full page size. Thanks for the good news.
Alice
I just got this response below from Family Search Feedback. As usual, I don’t know what they are talking about.
I no longer have trouble moving from image to image.
I did complain about the little box on the bottom right (I guess that is what they mean by the image map) no longer being available. Because of my arthritis, I find it very difficult to move my mouse around the whole screen instead of just around the little window.
I don’t know what they mean about edge to edge viewing of images, or HTML being browser resident—terms too technical for me.
I am glad that on October 1 I will be able to print only the part of the image I want instead of having to save both pages on the image, then cropping it using other software. Too much rigamaroll.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Dear Emilie Garcia,
Thank you for sharing your concerns about changes to FamilySearch.
Following are some reasons for the change:
There are problems using the current Flash version, such as moving from image to image in full screen view and others.
Flash is difficult to maintain with different versions of Windows, browsers, etc.
Many archives do not allow Flash technology.
Flash cannot show images with large pixel sizes.
Flash doesn’t run on mobile devices.
Flash doesn’t run well with the MACs.
These features are no longer available in the HTML version:
The image map in the lower right hand corner - patrons can use the mouse to move the image around the screen
Full screen - edge to edge viewing of images - the HTML version is browser resident
Printing will be full screen - partial printing will be not be available until the first week of October, 2011; thereafter patron will be able to adjust screen to correct size and print what they see.
We are here to help you in any way that we can and want your experience to be a positive one. Best wishes and success in your continuing family history endeavors.